|
Aztec–Tanoan is a hypothetical and undemonstrated language family that proposes a genealogical relation between the Tanoan and the Uto-Aztecan families. In some forms, Aztec–Tanoan has also included the Zuni isolate. This proposed classification has not been definitively demonstrated, largely because of slow progress in the reconstruction of the intermediate stages of the two language families involved,〔Kenneth L. Hale. 1967. Toward a Reconstruction of Kiowa-Tanoan Phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics , Vol. 33, No. 2 (Apr., 1967), pp. 112-120〕 but is still considered promising by many linguists.〔DAVIS, Irvine, author. 1989. "A new look at Aztec-Tanoan." In General and Amerindian ethnolinguistics: In remembrance of Stanley Newman, Mary Ritchie Key and Henry M. Hoenigswald (eds.). pages 365-79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.〕〔NEWMAN, S. (1954), American Indian Linguistics in the Southwest. American Anthropologist, 56: 626–634. doi: 10.1525/aa.1954.56.4.02a00180〕 The grouping was originally proposed by Edward Sapir in his 1921 classification, but it was not until 1937 that supporting evidence was published by Benjamin Lee Whorf and G. L. Trager. Their proposal included some 67 proposed cognates, but subsequent reviews have found most of them to be unconvincing (monosyllables, onomatopoeia). A small number of their proposed cognates do seem to have some merit and in his 1997 review of the hypothesis Lyle Campbell states that the proposal is not implausible but requires detailed study.〔Campbell 1997:273〕 A recent article by Jane H. Hill argues that the evidence cited for the genetic relation by Whorf and Trager is better understood as a result of language contact between the Uto-Aztecan and Tanoan proto-languages.〔Hill, Jane H. 2002. Toward a Linguistic Prehistory of the Southwest: "Azteco-Tanoan" and the Arrival of Maize Cultivation. Journal of Anthropological Research , Vol. 58, No. 4 (Winter, 2002), pp. 457-475〕 ==Proposed cognates== The following word pairs are the proposed cognates from Whorf & Trager (1937) and Davis (1979) considered promising by Campbell (1997:273). *'stand', Uto-Aztecan ''wine/wene/wi''"-; Proto-Tanoan ''gwine'' (Whorf & Trager's set 12) *Uto-Aztecan ''siwa''- 'woman'; Proto-Tanoan ''liw''- (Davis Kiowa-Tanoan *''siu'') (Whorf & Trager's set 31 / Davis' set 85) *'three', Uto-Aztecan ''pahi''; Proto-Tanoan ''poyuwo'' (Davis' UA *''pahi/ *pahayu''; Kiowa-Tanoan *''podzu(a)/ *pocua'') (Whorf & Trager's set 73) *Proto-Numic '' *pi(h)wi, *pi(h)yi'' 'heart'; Kiowa-Tanoan *''pia''(Davis) (Davis' set 3, Whorf & Trager's set 84) *Uto-Aztecan '' *pu:la'' 'tie'; Kiowa-Tanoan '' *phe, *ph^'' 'wrap, tie' (Davis' set 14, Whorf & Tragers' set 87) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Aztec–Tanoan languages」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|